The email subject reads:
It's not about kids. It's about kids with guns.Oooh. Isn't that a good line?
See, by putting the word "gun" next to the word "kids," Dan sets up the great potential for PSH. And PSH, as we know, is the basis for all GCC* Talking Points.
But let's get to that doozy of the line I mentioned. Dan says:
Three Charndon, Ohio families each buried a child last week not because a teenager was so troubled that he became violent — but because a troubled, violent teenager had easy access to a gun.There's the line:
a troubled, violent teenager had easy access to a gun.Ain't that a doozy?
A doozy because CNN tells us:
Lane told authorities that he stole the gun used in the shootings from his uncle, a source told CNN on Tuesday.So yeah. Lane had easy access.
Because he stole the damn thing from his uncle!
Looks like Dan (like the rest of the GCC) sees only what he wants to see, so long as it agrees with his worldview.
Translation: Dan Gross denies reality.
*GCC: Gun Control Cultists